重庆妇幼保健院输卵管吻合术养心在线

来源:搜狐娱乐
原标题: 重庆妇幼保健院输卵管吻合术
Apple has removed hundreds of apps from the iTunes App Store that secretly collected personal information from anyone who downloaded them.苹果公司已经从苹果商店中下架了上百个应用软件,这些应用都涉及秘密收集用户私人信息。Most of the 256 affected apps were made in China, but they were available worldwide on the app store and were downloaded 1 million times, according to app analytics service SourceDNA, which first discovered the problem.根据一款名叫SourceDNA的分析务应用软件提供的数据,这次下架的256个应用中大部分出自中国,但是他们在苹果商店中面向了全球,而且已经被下载了100万次。也正是这个软件第一个发现了这个窃取信息的问题。The apps#39; creators used a software development kit from a Chinese advertising company called Youmi, which allowed the developers to put ads in their apps. That#39;s kosher.这款应用的创始人使用了一款由名叫有米的中国广告公司提供的软件开发系统,这个软件让应用软件开发者可以在自己的应用里加入广告,这是可以的。But Youmi#39;s software gathered information about the people who downloaded the apps, including their email addresses and iPhone serial numbers -- sending all that data to Youmi#39;s servers. That skirted Apple#39;s strict privacy guidelines for app developers.但是有米的软件从下载了它的使用者哪里收集了信息,包括电子邮箱和电话序列号,并且将所有数据穿回给有米的务器。这种做法有悖于苹果公司对应用软件开发者严格的隐私保护要求。And the way Youmi designed the software hid that fact from the developers and Apple#39;s iTunes App Store gatekeepers.而且有米这个软件的设计方式将事实隐藏起来,使其不被使用它的软件开发者和苹果商店的守卫发现。SourceDNA did not say which apps were affected. The company told Apple about the problem on Sunday, and Apple removed the apps on Monday.SourceDNA 没有说那些应用软件受到影响。这家公司于周日向苹果公司举报了这件事,苹果公司在周一就移除了这些违规的应用软件。;This is a violation of our security and privacy guidelines,; Apple said in a statement. ;The apps using Youmi#39;s SDK will be removed from the App Store and any new apps submitted to the App Store using this SDK will be rejected.;“这是对我们的安保系统和隐私保护条例的一次攻击,”苹果公司公开表示,“使用了有米的SDK的应用软件都将会被从苹果商店里清除,而且所有申请在苹果商店上架的应用如果使用这个SDK也将会被拒绝。”Anyone who aly downloaded the apps will still be able to use them but the apps won#39;t be updated.任何已经下载了这些应用的用户还能够继续使用,但是这些应用将不能再上传数据了。The data collection does not appear to be the developers#39; fault, since Youmi was disguising the fact that its software was sending that data to its servers. Apple said it is working with the app developers to update their apps, ensuring they are safe for customers and in compliance with the app store#39;s guidelines. The apps are banned from the store until they are fixed.收集信息并不是软件开发者的失误,因为是有米在隐瞒事实,这些被窃取的数据实际上都是传回到了它自己的务器里。苹果公司表示他们正在和应用软件的开发者一起解决问题,重新上载这些应用,保它们现在对消费者是安全的并且完全遵守苹果商店的规定的。被禁止使用的应用在修护好了之后仍然可以重新回到商店。This is the third big lapse in Apple#39;s typically tight app store security in the past month.这是上个月苹果公司一直严苛的苹果商店安全系统的第三次大漏洞。Last week, Apple banned a group of apps that were able to peek into encrypted communications between the iPhones they were installed on and the servers the phones communicated with.上周,苹果公司又叫停了一组偷窥苹果用户之间加密的聊天内容的应用软件,安装了这些软件的电话和与这部电话有信息交流的务器都遭到了偷窥。上周,苹果公司又叫停了一组偷窥苹果用户之间加密的聊天内容的应用软件,安装了这些软件的电话和与这部电话有信息交流的务器都遭到了偷窥。In late September, the app store suffered a major attack, forcing Apple to remove dozens of popular apps that had been infected by malware. The malicious apps were capable of duping customers into giving up their iCloud passwords and opening dangerous websites.九月底,苹果公司遭到了一次大型攻击,导致苹果不得不移除几十个受到恶意软件攻击的热门应用。这些恶意软件可以骗用户说出他们的苹果云秘密,或者打开危险的网页。 /201510/405132He may have been right about disk drives, mechanical excavators and steel mills. But Clayton Christensen, whose theory of disruptive innovation underpins much of current business management thought, was wrong about Apple.克莱顿o克里斯坦森开创的颠覆性创新理论(disruptive innovation),也许适用于磁盘驱动器、机械挖掘机和炼钢厂,但遇到苹果(Apple)时,这项被当前许多企业管理思想作为基石的理论就不灵了。Not just in 2006, when he foresaw the imminent demise of the iPod. Or in 2007, when he said that the iPhone would not succeed. Or in 2012, when he predicted that Apple’s integrated iPhones and iPads would succumb to Samsung’s and Google’s modular approach.他曾经在2006年预测iPod即将消亡,在2007年表示iPhone不会取得成功,也曾在2012年预测称,集成化的iPhone和iPad最终将败给三星(Samsung)和谷歌(Google)的模块化产品。“Christensen is going to go zero for three,” quipped Stratechery‘s Ben Thompson in September.科技客Stratechery的撰稿人本o汤普森在今年9月表示:“克里斯坦森的三个预测没有一个正确。”Christensen has been taking his lumps lately, and not just in the blogosphere. In June he was attacked at length in The New Yorker by a fellow Harvard academic, Jill Lapore, who cataloged errors and oversights in his seminal texts: The Innovator’s Dilemma(1997) and The Innovator’s Solution (2003).近来,克里斯坦森遭受了不少笔诛口伐,而且不仅仅是在客圈。今年6月,他的哈佛大学(Harvard University)同事吉尔o拉波尔在《纽约客》(The New Yorker)杂志上发表了长篇檄文,猛烈批判克里斯坦森,文中还引用了克里斯坦森著作《创新者的窘境》(The Innovator’s Dilemma,1997年出版)和《创新者的解决之道》(The Innovator’s Solution,2003年出版)中的错误和纰漏。Lapore was largely dismissed in tech circles as a history professor who knew little about managing high tech and less about the nature of academic theories.拉波尔是一位历史学教授,对如何管理高科技公司并不在行,更不用说研究相关领域的学术理论了,因此他的批评并未受到科技圈的广泛关注。Not so easily dismissed are more recent critiques by tech experts like Ben Thompson (What Clay Christensen got wrong) or Ben Bajarin (Disrupting Disruption Theory) or Jean Louis Gassée (Clayton Christensen becomes his own devil’s advocate).然而最近,来自科技专家本o汤普森的文章《克雷o克里斯坦森错在哪里》、本o巴加林的《推翻颠覆性创新理论》、以及简o路易斯o加斯撰写的文章《克雷o克里斯坦森是其自身魔鬼的拥护者》,也纷纷提出了批评。他们可就不容易被忽视了。Or, for that matter, Horace Dediu, one of Christensen’s most prominent defenders.甚至连克里斯坦森最知名的拥护者霍雷斯o德迪欧,现在也站到了质疑者的行列。Dediu has made a career of popularizing Christensen’s ideas, sping the gospel of disruption in his Asymco blogs, his Critical Path podcasts and his Airshow padcasts. The theory, he says, draws its narrative strength from one of mankind’s oldest stories: The rise of the underdog. David and Goliath. The weak defeating the strong.德迪欧一直以普及克里斯坦森的思想为己任,在他的客Asymco、播客Critical Path和Airshow上竭力传播颠覆性创新理论福音。他表示,这一理论从落魄者的崛起、大卫击败歌利亚、弱者击败强者等等这些人类最古老的故事中汲取了叙事力量。Yet in a discussion on Bajarin’s Techpinions podcast last month, even Dediu had to admit that Christensen’s theory must be adapted to fit the market for consumer tech. “When it comes to consumers,” he says, “there are some twists to the plot.”然而,上月在参加巴加林的播客Techpinions进行的一个讨论时,甚至连德迪欧也不得不承认,克里斯坦森的理论必须有所调整,才能适应科技消费品市场。他表示:“一旦涉及到消费者,情况就会有些变化。”The problem, Thompson, Bajarin and Dediu all agree, is that the theory emerged from an analysis of business-to-business markets where purchase decisions are made by business managers, not consumers. Business managers tend to make rational decisions that have more to do with dollars and cents than with the experience of using a product.汤普森、巴加林和德迪欧都承认,问题的根源在于,这套理论源于克里斯坦森对B2B市场(即企业对企业市场)所做的分析。在这个市场中,做出购买决定的是企业管理者,而不是消费者。企业管理者做出的理性决策往往是基于经济方面的核算,而非使用产品的体验。Consumers care about dollars and cents too, but they also care about a host of other factors — things like ease of use, brand loyalty and what their friends are using. Marketing departments spend millions to understand the subtle differences that make consumers buy one product and not another. It’s a well-studied field. Most tech companies, however, know nothing about it.消费者也重视金钱,但他们同样重视一系列其他因素——易用性、品牌忠诚度,以及他们的朋友会使用什么产品。营销部门动辄花费数百万美元来了解促使消费者做出不同购买决定的细微差异。这是一个被深入研究的领域。然而,大部分科技公司对此还一无所知。“What Apple figured out,” Dediu says, “is that if they learned just 10% of what is known about how consumers behave and applied some of that theory to their products, they could make them more desirable to average people.”德迪欧表示:“苹果的发现是:只要他们能掌握仅仅10%的消费者行为学知识,并活学活用,他们就能生产出对普通大众更具诱惑力的产品。”It helped, according to Dediu, that Steve Jobs was an “instinctive disruptor.”德迪欧说,这很管用,史蒂夫o乔布斯是“天生的颠覆者”。Dediu is bullish about Apple Watch, even though the attraction of the luxury watch market escapes him. He aly finds himself at sea in contemporary shopping malls, where there is almost nothing he wants to buy and where 95% of purchase decisions are being made not on the basis of functionality, but for purely psychological reasons.德迪欧很看好苹果手表,尽管奢侈品手表市场对他没什么吸引力。他发现在当今的购物商场中,他有些无所适从,他几乎没有想买的东西,而95%的购买决定都不是基于功能需求,而是纯粹的心理需求。“Why are people in this shop and not the shop next door that seems to be selling the same products?” he asks toward the end of the podcast. “These things are mysterious to me.”在播客讨论的最后,他问道:“为什么人们会在这家店里,而不是在销售同样产品的隔壁店里买东西?对我来说,这是件神奇的事情。”(财富中文网) /201412/347719

Goldfish Now Have Better Attention Spans Than We Do人类注意力比金鱼还差Last week, Microsoft released a study that sought to analyze the impact that technology – cellphones and social media specifically – is having on our attention span and the quality of our focus. They found some pretty significant changes compared with research conducted 15 years ago. Let#39;s take a look at the findings.上周,微软公司就现代科技——手机和社交媒体对我们注意力时长和质量的影响做了一项调查。研究发现,与15年前做的调查相比,有了很大的改变。让我们来看看调查结果。1. The average attention span has fallen to just eight seconds.1.平均注意力时长降到了8秒The average human attention span in 2000 was 12 seconds, and now it#39;s just eight. The decrease was found across genders and all age groups. Apparently, a goldfish has an attention span of nine seconds. Measuring the attention span of animals is sort of tricky stuff though … so it#39;s possible we still have them beat.2000年人类平均注意力时长为12秒,现在只有8秒。各个年龄段的注意力时长都有下降。连一条金鱼的注意力时长都有9秒。不过研究动物时会有其他不确定因素,所以也许我们仍领先。。。2. Young people were most likely to demonstrate addiction-like behaviors when it came to digital technology.2.年轻人更容易痴迷科技产品Seventy-seven percent of 18- to 24-year-olds responded ;yes; when asked if the following statement was true for them: ;When nothing is occupying my attention, the first thing I do is reach for my phone.; Only 10 percent of people over 65 said the same thing.当问及以下问题是,18到24年龄段的青年中有77%人回答“是的”。这些问题是:“如果眼前没什么可做的,我会想到第一件事就是看手机。”而65岁以上人群中仅有10%会这么做。3. Young people may be more alert, just for shorter increments of time.3.相对下降的注意力,年轻人更灵敏The good news is that these young people, ;early adopters of technology,; as the study sometimes refers to them, have developed some strengths to accommodate for their shorter attention spans. 好消息是这项研究提到,那些走在科技前沿的年轻人已经进化出其他能力来弥补较短的注意力时长。4. The ability to multitask has improved.4.同时处理多重事件的能力有改变Part of the explanation for the shortened attention span comes from what the study refers to as ;multi-screening; – viewing multiple screens at once, using social media while consuming the latest news, etc. As long as the environment is active, early tech adopters are able to process information and commit it to memory more efficiently. But, their capabilities fall short if the digital experience is passive – probably due to their decreased ability to focus for long periods of time. 变短的注意力时长有些方面也可归因为“多屏”处理能力,即人们可以同时注视多个屏幕,比如看新闻的时候使用社交应用,等等。在主动环境下,使用科技产品的老手可以更有效的处理信息并把信息储存在记忆里。但是,如果是被动的,这些能力很可能会因为他们下降的注意力时长而减弱。译文属原创,仅供学习和交流使用,未经许可,。 /201509/393785

Nov 19 LG Electronics Inc said on Thursday it signed an agreement to develop its own mobile payment service called LG Pay.LG电子在11月19日表示已签署一份协议,将研发自己的移动付务系统,名为“LG Pay”。LG, which signed the agreement with South Korea#39;s largest and second-largest credit card firms Shinhan Card Co Ltd and KB Kookmin Card Co Ltd, did not give a timetable or description of its planned technology.LG电子与韩国前两大信用卡公司Shinhan Card与KBKookmin Card签订协议,不过并未就计划中的这项技术提供时间表或描述。The mobile payment market is getting crowded as smartphone makers like Apple and Samsung Electronics Co Ltd have launched their own mobile payment services.由于苹果与三星电子业已推出他们的移动付务,移动付市场已渐趋拥挤。LG Electronics#39; mobile payment system will be able to be used in all LG smartphones, unlike Samsung Pay which is available only in the recent Samsung smartphone models, South Korean wire service Yonhap reported on Thursday, without citing a specific source.根据韩国联合通讯社周四报导,只要是LG电子的智能手机,就能使用LG的移动付系统;这与三星电子的“Samsung Pay”不同,三星的移动付只适用于自家新近推出的智能手机。不过报导并未点明消息来源。An LG spokesman declined to comment on the report.LG电子发言人对此项报道拒绝做出。 /201512/413175Researchers are now pretty certain there#39;s a ninth planet in the solar system.研究人员如今相当确定,太阳系中存在着第九颗行星。Konstantin Batygin and Mike Brown, two CalTech scientists, say the new planet is about 10 times the mass of Earth and has an atmosphere of hydrogen and helium. Science magazine reports that the mysterious ;Planet X; moves in a distant orbit beyond Neptune.两名来自加利福尼亚理工学院的科学家康斯坦丁·巴特金和迈克·布朗,称新行星的质量大约是地球的十倍,其大气中有含有氢和氦。据《科学》杂志报道,这颗神秘的X行星的运行轨道远在海王星之外。The researchers haven#39;t observed Planet X itself, but believe it exists because of the unique configuration of six objects when they come closest to the sun, according to Science.《科学》称,尽管研究人员目前尚未观测到X行星的本尊,但他们在近距离观测太阳时发现六个星体的排位很奇特,因此他们确信一定存在X行星。The scientists say that there#39;s a 0.007 percent probability that the configuration is due to chance, and instead are confident it#39;s a ninth planet. They believe they will observe the planet with a telescope within five years, according to The Associated Press.科学家称,这样奇特的排位若是纯属巧合,其几率仅为0.007%,因此他们坚信这一定是因为有第九颗行星存在的缘故。美联社称,科学家们相信五年内他们一定能用望远镜观测到这个行星。So where did this possible planet come from? Scientists have previously speculated that there could be a missing planet in our solar system, with some theorizing that a collision caused it to be ejected out of our system some 4 billion years ago. That collision may have been with Jupiter.那么这颗可能存在的行星到底来自哪里呢?科学家们曾根据理论研究猜测,大约四十亿年前的一场碰撞将一颗行星弹出太阳系,从此这颗行星便下落不明。碰撞的另一颗行星可能是木星。;Although we were initially quite skeptical that this planet could exist, as we continued to investigate its orbit and what it would mean for the outer solar system, we become increasingly convinced that it is out there,; Batygin said in a statement. ;There is solid evidence that the solar system#39;s planetary census is incomplete.;“虽然一开始我们对这颗行星的存在持怀疑态度,但是随着我们进一步研究其运行轨道以及其对外太阳系的影响,我们越来越确信它的存在。”巴特金在一份陈述中如是说道,“有确切据表明,行星普查的数据并不完整。”Batygin and Brown described their findings in The Astronomical Journal on Wednesday.20日,巴特金和布朗在《天文学期刊》中阐述了他们的发现。The discovery is also the second time that Brown has reshaped the way we think about the solar system. In 2005, he made a key discovery that led scientists to reclassify Pluto as a dwarf planet. In a statement on Wednesday, Brown -- whose Twitter handle is @plutokiller -- alluded to the role he played in getting Pluto declassified, noting that the new discovery was 5,000 times the mass of Pluto and was definitely a planet.这个新发现也是布朗第二次改变我们对太阳系的看法。2005年,他的一项重要发现引导科学家们将冥王星重新归类为矮行星。布朗的推特名是冥王星杀手(@plutokiller),暗示自己在推翻冥王星地位这一事件中起主要作用;他于20日发表的一份陈述中说道,这次的新发现,其质量是冥王星的5000倍,因此它绝对是一颗行星。;All those people who are mad that Pluto is no longer a planet can be thrilled to know that there is a real planet out there still to be found,; he said.布朗说:“冥王星的行星地位被推翻后,许多人很生气,不过现在有一颗真正的新行星正等待着去发现,这可有他们乐呵的啦。” /201601/423366

Google co-founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin have revealed plans to sell shares currently worth .4bn over the next two years, in a move that would leave them little room for further sales without ending their combined control of the company.谷歌(Google)共同创始人拉里#8226;佩吉(Larry Page)和谢尔盖#8226;布林(Sergey Brin)打算在今后两年内出售一批股份,目前价值44亿美元。在这批股份转让之后,他们如继续出售股份,就很可能丧失对谷歌的联合控制权。The disposal plans, revealed in a regulatory filing, would leave the Google founders with barely half the shares they held when they took Google public in 2004. However, their remaining combined stake would still be worth nearly bn.这一股票出售计划是在一份监管文件中披露的,将令两位谷歌创始人持有的股份降至2004年谷歌上市时的一半。不过,他们所持剩余股份总价值仍接近450亿美元。The expected sales were disclosed as part of a 10b trading plan, under which executives report their intended disposals but give up control over the timing of when the sales are made.这次即将发生的股票转让是一项10b条款交易计划的一部分。按照这一计划,主管需汇报其股票转让打算,并放弃对抛售时间的控制权。Mr Brin and Mr Page control Google through a special class of shares that gives them 54.6 per cent of the voting rights, even though their economic interest is only 13.1 per cent.布林和佩吉通过一种特殊类型的股份控制谷歌,这类股份令他们虽然只拥有13.1%的经济权益,但却拥有谷歌54.6%的投票权。After the latest sales, their voting control will fall to only 52 per cent, Google said.谷歌表示,在完成最近这次股票销售之后,他们的投票控制权将跌至只有52%。The company issued a new class of non-voting C shares last year in a move to protect the founders’ control over the long term. The new shares are expected to be used to fund acquisitions and employee stock plans without diluting the founders’ control.该公司去年曾发行过一种新型的无投票权C类股票,以保护两人的长期控股权。这种新型股票预计将用于在不稀释两人控制权的前提下,为收购及员工持股计划提供资金。Google also at first proposed that Mr Brin and Mr Page — who hold half their stake in the form of the C shares — should be free to sell this class of stock to raise cash if they wanted.谷歌起初还曾提议,允许布林和佩吉随心所欲地自由出售这类股票,以筹集资金。在两人持有的股份中,半数股份是这种C类股份。However, an investor lawsuit forced a settlement in which the founders agreed to sell their super-voting shares in equal proportion to the C stock, leaving them facing dilution to their control if they continue to make big disposals.然而,投资者发起一轮法律诉讼,强制谷歌达成了一项和解协议。按照协议,两人同意以C类股份相同比例出售其拥有超级投票权的股份。这导致他们一旦继续大举抛售股票,就有可能面临控股权的稀释。 /201502/360315

The Diamond Sutra《金刚经》The oldest extant printed book with a specific date in our country as well as in the world is the Diamond Sutra. The block-printed Diamond Sutra , printed in the ninth year of Xiantong of the Tang Dynasty (868) , is a Buddhist scripture scroll which is some 16 meters long and made up of 6 bonded equal-sized pieces of paper with the Buddhist scripture on them. At the beginning of the scroll is a picture entitled the Garden of the Benefactor of the Orphans and Solitary, in which Gautama Buddha gives Dharma teachings in the Jetavana Vihara; on the rest of the scroll is written the text of the Diamond Sutra with an in scription which s ; On 15 , April in the ninth year of Xiantong, Wang Jie printed the book for the sake of beseeching blessings for his parents;. The world-renowned Diamond Sutra , initially hidden in the Gtianfo Cave of Dunhuang Grottos in Gansu Province, was discovered in 1899 and then purchased illegally by an Englishman Stein in 1907. It is now collected in the British Museum in London.我国及世界现存最早的有明确日期的印刷书是《金刚经》。《金刚经》是雕版印刷,印成于唐咸通九年(868),它是一部长约16米的佛教经卷,由6张尺寸一致的印有经文的纸张粘接而成。卷首有一幅题为《祗树给孤独园》的同画,面着释迦牟尼佛在祗园精舍说法的故事,其余为《金刚经》全文,题有“咸通九年四月十五日王玢为二亲敬造普施”一行。这卷举世闻名的《金刚经》,原藏甘肃敦煌千佛洞,1899年发现,1907年被英人斯坦因盗去,现藏伦敦不列颠物馆。 /201601/419344

  • 百度典范沙坪坝不育不孕检查
  • 输卵管照影江北
  • 美门户北碚国家免费优生孕前检查康泰报
  • 重庆爱德华综合医院治疗宫颈炎多少钱导医面诊
  • 重庆不孕不育权威医院赶集口碑重庆无痛流产哪里好
  • 久久在线南岸输卵管堵塞检测
  • 重庆人流哪家最好
  • 69优惠重庆市第一人民医院处女膜修复快问助手
  • 重庆爱德华综合医院看男科怎么样百家爱问
  • 重医附一院婚前检查
  • 重庆市肿瘤医院精索静脉曲张手术费用平安信息北碚渝北区治疗妇科炎症多少钱
  • 九龙坡治不孕哪家医院好安心时讯
  • 豆瓣新闻黔江那个医院接输卵管
  • 渝中区手术治疗输卵管
  • 重庆看妇科哪些医院好妙手频道
  • 重庆哪家医院做无痛人流手术便宜安康新闻重庆第一医院封闭抗体阴性治疗
  • 365面诊重庆做人流去哪家医院好周常识
  • 巴南女性不孕医院快乐新闻
  • 彭水苗族土家族自治县妇科医院哪家好
  • 重庆爱德华综合医院治疗男性不育多少钱排名助手
  • 华在线綦江输卵管畅而不通养心典范
  • 重庆看产科需要多少钱
  • 飞度解答重庆市第三人民医院孕检多少钱39问答
  • 重庆爱德华男科专家排名口碑
  • 管养生九龙坡检查输卵管的医院飞度中文
  • 江北正规不孕不育医院
  • 合川孕前检查私立医院有哪些
  • 重庆爱德华治疗早泄多少钱
  • 重庆妇科医院人流要多少钱
  • 酉阳土家族苗族自治县妇产科医院哪家好120口碑
  • 相关阅读
  • 巴南疏通输卵管费用39资讯
  • 妇幼保健院不孕不育好不好
  • 泡泡门户大渡口治不孕症专业医院
  • 渝中区哪里免费孕前检查度分享
  • 重庆无痛人流哪家医院做的好
  • 九龙坡市不孕不育医院那个好周生活重庆引产做医院排名
  • 长寿输卵管造影检查
  • 好口碑重庆市妇幼保健院无痛人流要多少钱网上问答
  • 黔江输卵管造影价格
  • 重庆市人民医院无精子症治疗
  • (责任编辑:郝佳 UK047)